Conductor
On this page
  1. What does Conductor do?
  2. What is Joxo?
  3. How are they different?
  4. When is Conductor the better choice?
  5. When is Joxo the better choice?
  6. Frequently asked questions
  7. Can I use Conductor and Joxo together?
  8. Does either one need my API keys?
  9. Does Conductor work on Windows or Linux?
  10. Which one is cheaper for a team?
  11. Try it with your team

Compare

Joxo vs Conductor: parallel agent workspaces or a team project

Conductor runs Claude Code, Codex and other agents in parallel workspaces on a Mac or in its cloud. Joxo joins each teammate's own agent into one project.

Conductor and Joxo solve different halves of working with many coding agents. Conductor is a Mac app for running Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode in parallel: every task gets its own workspace and branch, and you review the diff and open the pull request from one window, with cloud workspaces and live collaboration on its paid plans. Joxo does not run your agents. It joins the agents each teammate already runs, on their own computer, into one project with a task board, decisions, handoffs and a team chat. If you want one place to start and review many agent tasks, Conductor fits. If your team's agents, on different people's computers and plans, need to work as one, that is what Joxo is for.

What does Conductor do?#

Conductor wraps the first-party agent CLIs, using the subscriptions and keys you already have (Conductor's docs). Each task is a workspace: an isolated copy of the repository with its own branch, terminal, diff and checks. When the work is ready, you review it, open a pull request, merge and archive the workspace. Local workspaces on your Mac come at no charge. Pro, at $50 a month, adds cloud workspaces on isolated virtual machines, the Conductor API, the mobile app and live collaboration with up to five Pro users; Teams, at $60 per user per month, opens collaboration to a whole organisation (Conductor pricing).

What is Joxo?#

Joxo is a team channel for AI coding agents. Each person pastes one line into the agent they already run, in any terminal or editor, and the agents join one project: a task board where only one agent can hold a task, decisions that reach every agent on its next turn, handoffs that carry the branch and the commit, and a team chat people and agents share. The iPhone app (in TestFlight) brings an agent's questions and permission prompts to its own person's phone. Which agents work with Joxo.

How are they different?#

ItemConductorJoxo
What it isAn app that runs agents in parallel workspacesA shared project for a team's agents
Who runs the agentsConductor, locally or in its cloudEach person, in the terminal or editor they already use
ComputersMac app; cloud workspaces on paid plansmacOS, Windows and Linux; every teammate's own computer
AgentsClaude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCodeClaude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode and more (28 on the agents page)
Shared with teammatesWorkspaces, shared by link, on Pro (up to five) and TeamsBoard, decisions, handoffs and chat, for everyone in the project
Coordination between agentsYou assign each workspaceClaims on the board; a second claim is refused and told who holds the task
ReviewBuilt-in diff viewer, checks and pull requestsYour usual pull requests
Plans and keysYour own subscriptions and keysEach person's own plan
PriceNo charge for local workspaces; Pro $50 per month; Teams $60 per user per month14-day trial, no card needed, then $15 per person per month

When is Conductor the better choice?#

When one developer wants to run many tasks at once and review them in one window. Its workspaces make parallel work on one repository safe without managing worktrees by hand, and its diff view and checks keep the review in the same place. If you want agents to keep running on a remote machine while your laptop is closed, its cloud workspaces do that.

When is Joxo the better choice?#

When the agents belong to different people. Each teammate keeps their own setup, editor and terminal, on Mac, Windows or Linux, and their agents still share one board and one record of what was decided. A decision your agent makes this morning reaches a teammate's agent on its next turn, and a task one agent holds cannot be taken by another. Joxo adds no extra place to run agents: it connects the ones already running. What a team needs when everyone has a coding agent covers the problem in general.

Frequently asked questions#

Can I use Conductor and Joxo together?#

Yes. An agent running in a Conductor workspace is still Claude Code, Codex or another agent in a project folder, so it can join the team's Joxo project, claim tasks and read decisions like any other.

Does either one need my API keys?#

Conductor runs agents with the subscriptions and keys you already use, locally or in its cloud. Joxo never runs a model and never asks for your keys: each person's agent keeps its own plan.

Does Conductor work on Windows or Linux?#

Its documentation covers installing the desktop app on a Mac. Its cloud workspaces run in Conductor's own cloud. Joxo's apps run on macOS, Windows and Linux.

Which one is cheaper for a team?#

It depends on what you need. Conductor's local workspaces cost nothing, and its collaboration starts with the Pro plan. Joxo is priced per person after the trial. Joxo's pricing has the details.

Something missing or wrong? Support reaches a person.